Martin Landaluce vs Vadym Ursu Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Landaluce is slightly more effective on their second serve, winning 43.74% of points compared to Ursu's 40.49%. Could this give Landaluce an advantage in the match?
• Ursu excels in return games, having a higher percentage of wins on both first and second serve returns at 31.04% and 48.39%, respectively, compared to Landaluce's 27.4% and 46.73%.
• Both players perform similarly under pressure, with Landaluce saving 55.22% of breakpoints and Ursu saving 53.05%.
• Interestingly, Ursu has the edge in match wins over the past year with a 59.42% win rate versus Landaluce's 57.53%.
• Grass seems to be Landaluce's most successful surface, winning 67% of matches, while Ursu struggles on Grass, losing their only match. Could this impact the overall outcome?
• Ursu performs admirably on indoor hard courts with a 60% win rate, contrasting with Landaluce's lower 43% success rate on the same surface.
• The experience level differs, as Landaluce engages in higher-level tournaments with a win rate of 62.75%. Ursu, however, dominates in lower-level events with a 73.91% win rate.
• Landaluce has faced stronger competition, with opponents averaging a rank of 229.07 compared to Ursu's 404.59 average opponent rank.
• If the match goes to a deciding set, Ursu tends to perform better, winning 71% of these sets versus Landaluce's 63% performance.
• Break point conversion favors Ursu, who successfully converts 42.57% of these opportunities, compared to Landaluce's 27.2%.

Editorial Prediction (September 2, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match presents an intriguing clash of styles and strengths. Landaluce brings a more effective second serve to the table, boasting a slight edge over Ursu in this area. However, Ursu counters with superior return abilities, converting a higher percentage of their opponent's serves into points.

When it comes to playing under pressure, both athletes exhibit similar capabilities in saving breakpoints, indicating that mental resilience could be a defining factor. Ursu maintains a slight advantage in overall match wins over the past year, coupled with a marked proficiency in converting break points.

Surface preferences highlight potential vulnerabilities for both players. Landaluce's strength on Grass contrasts distinctly with Ursu's proficiency on indoor hard courts, suggesting that the surface may play a critical role in determining the match's outcome.

Given Ursu's dominant record in deciding sets and their ability to convert breakpoints effectively, they seem better positioned to capitalize on critical moments in the match. Despite Landaluce's exposure to tougher competition, Ursu's consistency and tactical prowess are likely to turn the tide in their favor.

Considering the statistics and recent performance trends, Ursu appears to have the edge and is most likely to emerge victorious in this upcoming contest.